Refereeing Department on September 12-13 games

September 12

Amur – Admiral

In the 7^th minute of the game in Khabarovsk, after an apparent goal scored by the home team, the referee called for the video goal judge to review the situation to ascertain whether Amur scored after a hand pass. The video review showed no hand pass, therefore, the goal was awarded correctly.

Salavat Yulaev – Torpedo

In the 44^th minute of the game in Ufa, after an apparent goal scored by the guests, the video goal judge reviewed the situation to ascertain whether the guest scored the goal with his hand. The video review showed that the Admiral player intentionally initiated hand contact with the puck, and as a result, the goal was struck out.

Avangard – Ak Bars

In the 52^nd minute of the game in Balashikha, after an apparent goal scored by the home team, the video goal judge reviewed the situation to ascertain whether the home player scored the goal with his hand. The video review showed that the Avangard player intentionally initiated hand contact with the puck, and as a result, the goal was struck out.

Dinamo Minsk – Spartak

In the 50^th minute of the game in Minsk, the home team scored an apparent goal which triggered a request from the visiting team bench for a video review. The appeal was made on the grounds of possible goalie interference. The video review showed that the home team player initiated contact with the goalie before the puck crossed the line, therefore the goal was struck out.

SKA – Jokerit

In the 20^th minute of the game in St. Petersburg, after an apparent goal scored by the guests, the referee called for the video goal judge to review the situation to ascertain whether the guest scored the goal with his foot. The video review showed that the Admiral player intentionally initiated foot contact with the puck, and as a result, the goal was struck out.

September 13

Slovan – HC Dynamo Moscow

In the 6^th minute of the game in Bratislava, after a shot by the guests directed to the home team’s net, the video goal judge referred to the video review to ascertain whether the puck fully crossed the line. The video showed that the puck did not fully cross the goal line, and as a result, the goal was struck out.

Avangard – Metallurg

In the 40^th minute of the game in Balashikha, after an apparent goal scored by the guests, the video goal judge referred to the video review to ascertain whether the guest scored the goal with his foot. The video review showed that the Metallurg player intentionally initiated foot contact with the puck, and as a result, the goal was struck out.